diff options
| author | Francis Rowe <info@gluglug.org.uk> | 2015-09-19 13:03:08 (EDT) |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Francis Rowe <info@gluglug.org.uk> | 2015-09-19 13:03:08 (EDT) |
| commit | abd9a2161cff52ce7d0ec80c1dca848740270e6a (patch) | |
| tree | 1a1853872afec414b0e4135578fcfb4ff7cf226f /site/faq | |
| parent | ad4df259c84a6b29ab87409a344c83a46c6263b9 (diff) | |
| download | libreboot.org-abd9a2161cff52ce7d0ec80c1dca848740270e6a.zip libreboot.org-abd9a2161cff52ce7d0ec80c1dca848740270e6a.tar.gz libreboot.org-abd9a2161cff52ce7d0ec80c1dca848740270e6a.tar.bz2 | |
FAQ: some HDDs are faster than USB 2.0
Diffstat (limited to 'site/faq')
| -rw-r--r-- | site/faq/index.php | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/site/faq/index.php b/site/faq/index.php index 71dfad6..24995fc 100644 --- a/site/faq/index.php +++ b/site/faq/index.php @@ -652,7 +652,8 @@ (he's talking about so-called 'fuzzing' attacks) </p> <p> - Based on this, it's safe to say that use of USB instead of SATA is advisable if security is a concern. USB 2.0 has plenty of bandwidth for HDDs, + Based on this, it's safe to say that use of USB instead of SATA is advisable if security is a concern. USB 2.0 has plenty of bandwidth for many HDDs (a few high-end ones + can use more bandwidth than USB 2.0 is capable of), but for SSDs it might be problematic (unless you're using USB 3.0, which is not yet usable in freedom. See <a href="#firmware-usbhost">#firmware-usbhost</a>). </p> <p> |