summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFrancis Rowe <info@gluglug.org.uk>2015-09-19 13:03:08 (EDT)
committer Francis Rowe <info@gluglug.org.uk>2015-09-19 13:03:08 (EDT)
commitabd9a2161cff52ce7d0ec80c1dca848740270e6a (patch)
tree1a1853872afec414b0e4135578fcfb4ff7cf226f
parentad4df259c84a6b29ab87409a344c83a46c6263b9 (diff)
downloadlibreboot.org-abd9a2161cff52ce7d0ec80c1dca848740270e6a.zip
libreboot.org-abd9a2161cff52ce7d0ec80c1dca848740270e6a.tar.gz
libreboot.org-abd9a2161cff52ce7d0ec80c1dca848740270e6a.tar.bz2
FAQ: some HDDs are faster than USB 2.0
-rw-r--r--site/faq/index.php3
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/site/faq/index.php b/site/faq/index.php
index 71dfad6..24995fc 100644
--- a/site/faq/index.php
+++ b/site/faq/index.php
@@ -652,7 +652,8 @@
(he's talking about so-called 'fuzzing' attacks)
</p>
<p>
- Based on this, it's safe to say that use of USB instead of SATA is advisable if security is a concern. USB 2.0 has plenty of bandwidth for HDDs,
+ Based on this, it's safe to say that use of USB instead of SATA is advisable if security is a concern. USB 2.0 has plenty of bandwidth for many HDDs (a few high-end ones
+ can use more bandwidth than USB 2.0 is capable of),
but for SSDs it might be problematic (unless you're using USB 3.0, which is not yet usable in freedom. See <a href="#firmware-usbhost">#firmware-usbhost</a>).
</p>
<p>