summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--site/faq/index.php4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/site/faq/index.php b/site/faq/index.php
index 94fa43b..77f3304 100644
--- a/site/faq/index.php
+++ b/site/faq/index.php
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
microcode and disables buggy parts of the CPU to improve reliability. In the past, these updates were
handled by the operating system kernel, but on all recent systems it is the boot firmware that must perform this task.
Coreboot does distribute microcode updates for Intel and AMD CPUs, but libreboot cannot, because the whole point of libreboot
- is to be 100% free software.
+ is to be 100% <a href="https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a>.
</p>
<p>
On some older Intel CPUs, it is possible to exclude the microcode updates and not have any reliability issues in practise.
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@
<p>
Intel is only going to get worse when it comes to user freedom. Libreboot has no support recent Intel platforms, precisely because
of the problems described above. The only way to solve this is to get Intel to change their policies and to be more friendly
- to the free software community. Reverse engineering won't solve anything long-term, unfortunately, but we need to keep doing it
+ to the <a href="https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> community. Reverse engineering won't solve anything long-term, unfortunately, but we need to keep doing it
anyway. Moving forward, Intel hardware is a non-option unless a radical change happens within Intel.
</p>
<p>