summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/essays
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'essays')
-rwxr-xr-xessays/commercial-free-software.html339
1 files changed, 339 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/essays/commercial-free-software.html b/essays/commercial-free-software.html
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..0267525
--- /dev/null
+++ b/essays/commercial-free-software.html
@@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
+<!--#set var="title" value="Commercial Free Software: Not an Oxymoron" -->
+<!--#include virtual="../includes/header.html" -->
+<h2>Commercial Free Software: Not an Oxymoron</h2>
+<p>
+ Many people believe that money can't be made in free (as in freedom)
+ software. They believe that "free" means "noncommercial", and they might
+ compare "open-source" software and "commercial" software as if the terms
+ were opposite and mutually exclusive. This is in fact a logical fallacy;
+ specifically it is an affirmation of a disjunct. Software can be both free
+ and commercial. If a software copyright license allowed only noncommercial
+ dealing, it would be considered neither free software nor open source.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Free software is in fact used commercially, and successful business models
+ around free software exist (and have existed longer than those around
+ proprietary software have). I've generalized the ways in which people make
+ money with free software into three broad categories: development, support,
+ and distribution.
+</p>
+<h3>
+ Development
+</h3>
+<p>
+ Modern economic models around free software closely resemble early economic
+ models around software. Keep in mind that software freedom is as old as
+ software itself. The "proprietarization", as I call it, of software began
+ around the 1970s, apparently pioneered by International Business Machines
+ (IBM). [1] It was furthered by companies like "Micro-Soft" and people like
+ Bill Gates, who in 1976 published an "Open Letter to Hobbyists" that
+ criticized people for sharing software without paying for it. [2] Before
+ that time, software was usually distributed with source code (some
+ universities even had policies of rejecting software that wasn't). Software
+ was often distributed either at no cost or at the cost of making and
+ shipping copies (at the time, on tapes). [3] Programmers were paid for the
+ time they spent writing software, not for copies of the software itself (or
+ really, licenses to use the software). [4] We see the same thing happening
+ today. Programmers are being paid to work on software, and the software is
+ distributed freely (that is, without unfair restrictions) and often even at
+ no charge.
+</p>
+<p>
+ I cite four major examples of this phenomenon of paid development of free
+ software. The first is Linux, a powerful and reliable high-performance
+ kernel found in everything from televisions and ATMs to large servers and
+ supercomputers (in fact, in over 90% of the world's 500 fastest
+ supercomputers [5]). As of 2010, over 70% of work done on Linux is done by
+ paid programmers. [6] At least 659 companies have supported the development
+ of Linux. [7] Compare that to the Windows NT kernel of Microsoft Windows,
+ the development of which is supported by only one company (the only one
+ legally allowed to do so). Additionally, AMD's recent hiring of two more
+ graphics driver developers shows that if you can improve a company's
+ freely-licensed software, they might hire you to do so officially. [8]
+</p>
+<p>
+ The next example is Qt, a flexible cross-platform application framework
+ popular in desktop, server, and embedded applications. [9] Qt is free
+ software, licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL)
+ version 2.1. [10] Most of Qt's developers are employed by Qt Development
+ Frameworks, a subsidiary of Nokia Corporation since 2008. [11]
+</p>
+<p>
+ My third example is GNAT, a compiler for the Ada programming language that
+ is now a part of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC). It was originally
+ developed by the New York University under a $3-million contract awarded by
+ the United States Air Force in 1992. Under the requirements of the
+ contract, copyright on the software was assigned to the Free Software
+ Foundation and the software was released under the GNU General Public
+ License (GPL). [12]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Finally, I cite the GNU Project, a project announced in 1983 with the
+ now-successful goal of creating a complete free operating system. The Free
+ Software Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization founded by Dr. Richard
+ Stallman in 1985 to support the development of free software, hired
+ programmers to work on parts of the GNU system. GNU Bash (a popular and
+ user-friendly command shell now used in systems like GNU/Linux and Apple
+ Mac OS X), GLIBC (a C library), and GNU tar (an archiving program) were all
+ initially developed by paid programmers. [13] Yet all are free software,
+ and all are distributed often at no charge.
+</p>
+<p>
+ But you may think this doesn't make any sense. Why do companies pay for the
+ development of software for which few people pay? They must be losing lots
+ of money. Actually, they have a financial interest in having high-quality
+ software available, even if few or no people actually pay for it (but
+ remember that free software is a matter of freedom, not price). Many
+ companies sell support for free software; we'll see more about this later.
+ Many companies sell hardware with which free software is run (servers,
+ wireless network adapters, digital cameras, mobile phones, televisions,
+ cars, <em>commercial airplanes</em>, etc.). Many companies see free software as a
+ way to save time and money and not have to reinvent the wheel. If you want
+ something that serves a similar but not identical function as a proprietary
+ program does, you have to write a new program from scratch; a free program,
+ on the other hand, can simply be adapted to a new purpose. I suspect this
+ is part of AMD's motivation in supporting Coreboot, a free bootloader that
+ is faster and more flexible than proprietary BIOSes, in their server and
+ embedded products. [14][15][16]
+</p>
+<p>
+ Finally, most software is custom software, software that is written for a
+ single person or company and not meant to be released. This software is
+ technically commercial and often free in a trivial sense. If there's one
+ user, and that user has the rights to the software, then the software is
+ free for all its users. [13][17]
+</p>
+<h3>
+ Support
+</h3>
+<p>
+ With proprietary software, only the copyright holder is allowed to
+ understand it, and only they are allowed to support it. Support of
+ proprietary software is a /monopoly/. (And as it turns out, this allows
+ something like extortion. A phone call to Microsoft about Windows XP costs
+ $59; an e-mail costs $49. And soon they'll discontinue support for Windows
+ XP completely. [18] You have to pay to report a bug, then pay for an
+ "upgrade" to see if they've fixed it. [13]) With free software, everyone is
+ allowed to understand it and support it. Support of free software is a
+ /free market/. [13] There is competition in free software support.
+ Companies and individuals must please their clients, because their clients
+ are free to go elsewhere for support.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Individuals make money from making changes to free programs. They can
+ support their own programs (in fact, Richard Stallman made a lot of money
+ doing this, more than he ever did before [13]) or anyone else's free
+ programs. Again, like the earliest programmers, these individuals are paid
+ for doing work, not for the results of their work. The results of their
+ work are usually free software that does what their clients want it to do.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Individuals and companies sell consulting services and support contracts
+ for free software. The first company to officially do so was Cygnus
+ Solutions, founded in 1989. Cygnus maintained many parts of the GNU
+ development toolchain and offered commercial support for GNU software.
+ Between 1999 and 2000, Cygnus merged with Red Hat, Inc. [19][20] Red Hat
+ sells support for GNU/Linux, and its revenue is expected to reach $1
+ billion this year, an impressive record. [21][22] Canonical Ltd., founded
+ in 2004, maintains and supports a number of free software projects,
+ including the Ubuntu GNU/Linux operating system. [23] Nokia Corporation
+ used to provide official support for the Qt framework, but earlier this
+ year it sold this support business to Digia Plc. [24] Digia is one of 27
+ "Qt Partners", companies that work with Nokia to provide commercial support
+ for Qt. [25] AdaCore is a company run by the original developers of GNAT,
+ the aforementioned Ada compiler commissioned by the U.S. Air Force. AdaCore
+ has been officially supporting GNAT since 1994. [12][26]
+ Sencha Inc. also offers support for its own free software.
+ [27] The Debian project has a list of 824 consultants in 63 countries who
+ support the use of Debian GNU operating systems. [28] The Free Software
+ Foundation lists 86 individuals and companies offering support services in
+ free software. [29] Clearly, there is a successful business model here --
+ one based in a free market.
+</p>
+<h3>
+ Distribution
+</h3>
+<p>
+ Additionally, some people sell free software. That is, they charge a fee
+ for distribution, even of other people's work. How is this morally
+ acceptable? A person can profit from someone else's hard work? Well, it may
+ go against the traditional free software economic model of paying for time
+ spent on work instead of for copies of the results of that work. But it's
+ not inherently unethical or even illegal. In fact, software licenses must
+ allow this practice in order to be considered free licenses. [30] In some
+ cases, there is a cost in making and distributing copies of software (e.g.
+ the cost of burning and shipping CDs). Or people may just want to earn some
+ money for performing a moral act (sharing freedom) and maybe even
+ contribute some of the profit back to the developers. [31] In the 1980s,
+ Richard Stallman himself charged a fee for copies of GNU Emacs (a text
+ editor he wrote) that he shipped on tape. In doing so, he made about $1300
+ per month, a respectable income from something that's "free"! [13]
+</p>
+<h3>
+ *Conclusion*
+</h3>
+<p>
+ In short, programmers have always had ways to earn money with free
+ software, even before proprietary software existed. Most programmers who
+ write free software are in fact paid for their work, in a variety of ways.
+ The difference in free and proprietary software economic models is that
+ copyright holders (not necessarily even the developers) of proprietary
+ software profit from restricting users, while free software developers make
+ money in more ethical ways. Free software programmers are usually paid for
+ the time spent writing software, not for copies of the software (or more
+ accurately, the right to use the software).
+</p>
+<ol>
+ <li>
+ "Proprietary Software". <span style="cite-title">Wikipedia</span>. July 10, 2011.
+ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Open Letter to Hobbyists". <span style="cite-title">Wikipedia</span>. July 6, 2011.
+ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Letter_to_Hobbyists">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Letter_to_Hobbyists</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ Williams, Sam. "For Want of a Printer". <span style="cite-title">Free as in Freedom</span>. 2002:
+ O'Reilly.
+ <a href="http://oreilly.com/openbook/freedom/ch01.html">http://oreilly.com/openbook/freedom/ch01.html</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ <span style="cite-title">The Codebreakers</span>. 2006: Asia Pacific Development Information
+ Programme. Aired on BBC World.
+ <a href="http://www.apdip.net/news/fossdoc">http://www.apdip.net/news/fossdoc</a>,
+ <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/The-Codebreakers">http://www.archive.org/details/The-Codebreakers</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Operating system Family share for 11/2010". <span style="cite-title">Top500 Supercomputing
+ Sites</span>. Top500.Org.
+ <a href="http://www.top500.org/stats/list/36/osfam">http://www.top500.org/stats/list/36/osfam</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ Kroah-Hartman, Greg; Corbet, Jonathan; and McPherson, Amanda. "Who is
+ Sponsoring the Work" <span style="cite-title">Linux Kernel Development: How Fast it is Going, Who
+ is Doing It, What They are Doing, and Who is Sponsoring It</span>. 2010: The
+ Linux Foundation.
+ <a href="http://www.linuxfoundation.org/docs/lf_linux_kernel_development_2010.pdf">http://www.linuxfoundation.org/docs/lf_linux_kernel_development_2010.pdf</a>.
+ 12-13.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ Kroah-Hartman, Greg; Corbet, Jonathan; and McPherson, Amanda. "Who is
+ Doing the Work" <span style="cite-title">Linux Kernel Development: How Fast it is Going, Who is
+ Doing It, What They are Doing, and Who is Sponsoring It</span>. 2010: The Linux
+ Foundation.
+ <a href="http://www.linuxfoundation.org/docs/lf_linux_kernel_development_2010.pdf">http://www.linuxfoundation.org/docs/lf_linux_kernel_development_2010.pdf</a>.
+ 10.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ Larabel, Michael. "AMD's New Open-Source Employees". <span style="cite-title">Phoronix</span>. July 5,
+ 2011.
+ <a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTYzOA">http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTYzOA</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Qt (framework)". <span style="cite-title">Wikipedia</span>. July 13, 2011.
+ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_%28framework%29">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_%28framework%29</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Qt Licensing". Nokia Corporation.
+ <a href="http://qt.nokia.com/products/licensing">http://qt.nokia.com/products/licensing</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Qt Development Frameworks". <span style="cite-title">Wikipedia</span>. July 8, 2011.
+ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_Development_Frameworks">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_Development_Frameworks</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "GNAT". <span style="cite-title">Wikipedia</span>. May 9, 2011.
+ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNAT">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNAT</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ Stallman, Richard. "Free Software: Freedom and Cooperation". <span style="cite-title">GNU
+ Project</span>. Free Software Foundation, Inc. July 13, 2011.
+ <a href="http://www.gnu.org/events/rms-nyu-2001-transcript.html">http://www.gnu.org/events/rms-nyu-2001-transcript.html</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Coreboot and Open Source Development". <span style="cite-title">Business Blog</span>. Advanced Micro
+ Devices, Inc. February 28, 2011.
+ <a href="http://blogs.amd.com/work/2011/02/28/amd-coreboot/">http://blogs.amd.com/work/2011/02/28/amd-coreboot/</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "AMD to use Coreboot in Llano, other upcoming parts". Fudzilla. May 10,
+ 2011.
+ <a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22677-amd-to-use-coreboot-in-llano-other-upcoming-parts">http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22677-amd-to-use-coreboot-in-llano-other-upcoming-parts</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Benefits". <span style="cite-title">coreboot</span>. January 15, 2008.
+ <a href="http://www.coreboot.org/Benefits">http://www.coreboot.org/Benefits</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Categories of Free and Nonfree Software". <span style="cite-title">GNU Project</span>. Free Software
+ Foundation, Inc. July 13, 2011.
+ <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#PrivateSoftware">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#PrivateSoftware</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Support Options". <span style="cite-title">Microsoft Support</span>. Microsoft Corporation. (No
+ portable URI. Go to
+ <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/oas/default.aspx?gprid=1173&st=1&wfxredirect=1&sd=gn">https://support.microsoft.com/oas/default.aspx?gprid=1173&st=1&wfxredirect=1&sd=gn</a>,
+ click "Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition", select "Other", and
+ click "Continue".)
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Cygnus Solutions". <span style="cite-title">Wikipedia</span>. June 8, 2011.
+ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus_Solutions">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus_Solutions</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Marketing Cygnus Support -- Free Software history". September 27,
+ 2006.
+ <a href="http://www.toad.com/gnu/cygnus/">http://www.toad.com/gnu/cygnus/</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ Woods, Dan. "Red Hat At $1 Billion". <span style="cite-title">CIO Central</span>. Forbes.com LLC.
+ November 30, 2010.
+ <a href="http://blogs.forbes.com/ciocentral/2010/11/30/red-hat-at-1-billion/">http://blogs.forbes.com/ciocentral/2010/11/30/red-hat-at-1-billion/</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ Dignan, Larry. "Red Hat: Nearing $1 billion in revenue; Not bad for
+ free software". <span style="cite-title">ZDNet</span>. CBS Interactive. March 23, 2011.
+ <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/red-hat-nearing-1-billion-in-revenue-not-bad-for-free-software/46445">http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/red-hat-nearing-1-billion-in-revenue-not-bad-for-free-software/46445</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Canonical Ltd.". <span style="cite-title">Wikipedia</span>. June 12, 2011.
+ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_Ltd.">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_Ltd.</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ Nystrom, Sebastian. "Nokia and Digia working together to grow the Qt
+ community". <span style="cite-title">The Qt Blog</span>. Nokia Corporation. March 7, 2011.
+ <a href="http://blog.qt.nokia.com/2011/03/07/nokia-and-digia-working-together/">http://blog.qt.nokia.com/2011/03/07/nokia-and-digia-working-together/</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Partner Locator". Nokia Corporation.
+ <a href="http://qt.nokia.com/partners/partner-locator">http://qt.nokia.com/partners/partner-locator</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "AdaCore". <span style="cite-title">Wikipedia</span>. May 20, 2011.
+ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdaCore">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdaCore</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Company". <span style="cite-title">Sencha</span>. Sencha Inc.
+ <a href="http://www.sencha.com/company/">http://www.sencha.com/company/</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Consultants". Debian Project. July 11, 2011.
+ <a href="http://www.debian.org/consultants/">http://www.debian.org/consultants/</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ Sullivan, John. "Service Directory". Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ April 14, 2011.
+ <a href="http://www.fsf.org/resources/service/">http://www.fsf.org/resources/service/</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "The Free Software Definition". <span style="cite-title">GNU Project</span>. Free Software
+ Foundation, Inc. July 13, 2011.
+ <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ "Selling Free Software". <span style="cite-title">GNU Project</span>. Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ July 13, 2011.
+ <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html</a>.
+ </li>
+</ol>
+<!--#include virtual="../includes/footer.html" -->