From 01a17f32f179c81fcbdc7899f61073d7d21bc772 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: P. J. McDermott <pjm@nac.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:27:39 -0500
Subject: Add preliminary additions to Secure Boot notes.

---
diff --git a/topics/secure-boot.txt b/topics/secure-boot.txt
index 9020645..9510d9a 100644
--- a/topics/secure-boot.txt
+++ b/topics/secure-boot.txt
@@ -61,3 +61,18 @@ ZDNet's Ed Bott contacted Dell and HP, 2011-11-02
 	notes that "having plans" isn't definitive, but is at least reassuring
 	HP wasn't aware of the issue, so the response is a general empty PR statement
 	nothing from Dell, HP, or AMI is reassuring
+
+TO ADD:
+	parallels with TC
+	anti-trust violations
+	MSFT history
+		DOS lockout
+		MBR multiboot lockout
+http://techrights.org/2011/09/22/tricks-with-boot-process/
+http://techrights.org/2011/09/29/boot-abuse-and-complaint/
+http://techrights.org/2009/08/20/linux-mbr-in-vista-7/
+http://techrights.org/2011/08/10/biggest-technology-bully/
+http://techrights.org/2011/05/08/system-updates-vs-grub/
+http://techrights.org/2009/01/24/ms-multi-boot-sabotage/
+http://techrights.org/2008/05/15/eula-hyper-on-motherboards/
+http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/columns/uefi_and_windows_8_bad_news_gnu_linux
--
cgit v0.9.1