1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<style type="text/css">
@import url('../css/main.css');
</style>
<title>ThinkPad X200</title>
</head>
<body>
<div class="section">
<h1 id="pagetop">ThinkPad X200</h1>
<p>
It is believed that all X200 laptops are compatible. X200S and X200 Tablet will
also work, <a href="#x200s">depending on the configuration</a>.
</p>
<p>
It *might* be possible to put an X200 motherboard in an X201 chassis, though this is currently untested
by the libreboot project. The same may also apply between X200S and X201S; again, this is untested.
<b>It's most likely true.</b>
</p>
<p>
There are two possible flash chip sizes for the X200: 4MiB (32Mbit) or 8MiB (64Mbit).
This can be identified by the type of flash chip below the palmrest: 4MiB is SOIC-8, 8MiB
is SOIC-16.
</p>
<p>
<b>The X200 laptops come with the ME (and sometimes AMT in addition) before flashing libreboot. Libreboot disables and removes it
by using a modified descriptor: see <a href="gm45_remove_me.html">gm45_remove_me.html</a></b> (contains notes, plus
instructions)
</p>
<p>
Flashing instructions can be found at <a href="../install/index.html#flashrom">../install/index.html#flashrom</a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="index.html">Back to previous index</a>.
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h2 id="compatibility_noblobs">Compatibility (without blobs)</h2>
<p>
Usual limitations apply for native graphics initialization
(no VBT and/or INT10H and only GRUB works so no BIOS, so no DOS/Windows support
- who cares? There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of it's kernels).
</p>
<p>
When connecting the AC adapter while system is powered off, system will then power on.
This probably happens in coreboot aswell (with or without blobs).
It's a minor annoyance, but it should be fixed (if it's not already fixed by now).
</p>
<p>
This method of disabling the ME leaves the flash descriptor and gbe in place (non-functional data, fully documented)
and disables the ME using soft straps. This means that the gigabit ethernet will still work (putting the machine in
non-descriptor mode would wipe it out).
</p>
<div class="subsection">
<h3 id="hwvirt">Hardware virtualization (vt-x)</h3>
<p>
The X200, when run without CPU microcode updates in coreboot, currently kernel panics
if running QEMU with vt-x enabled on 2 cores for the guest. With a single core enabled
for the guest, the guest panics (but the host is fine). Working around this in QEMU
might be possible; if not, software virtualization should work fine (it's just slower).
</p>
<p>
The following errata datasheet from Intel might help with investigation:
<a href="http://download.intel.com/design/mobile/specupdt/320121.pdf">http://download.intel.com/design/mobile/specupdt/320121.pdf</a>
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h2 id="x200s">X200S and X200 Tablet.</h2>
<p>
X200S and X200 Tablet have raminit issues at the time of writing
(GS45 chipset. X200 uses GM45).
</p>
<p>
X200S is known to work, but only with certain CPU+RAM configurations.
The current stumbling block is RCOMP and SFF, mentioned in
<a href="https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~410/doc/minimal_boot.pdf">https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~410/doc/minimal_boot.pdf</a>.
</p>
<p>
The X200 Tablet should also work, but it is not guaranteed.
</p>
<p>
The issues mostly relate to raminit (memory initialization). With an
unpatched coreboot, you get the following: <a href="text/x200s/cblog00.txt">text/x200s/cblog00.txt</a>.
No SODIMM combination that was tested would work. At first glance, it looks
like GS45 (chipset that X200S uses. X200 uses GM45) is unsupported, but
there is a workaround that can be used to make certain models of the X200S
work, depending on the RAM.
</p>
<p>
The datasheet for GS45 describes two modes: low-performance and
high-performance. Low performance uses the SU range of ultra-low
voltage procesors (SU9400, for example), and high-performance uses the
SL range of processors (SL9400, for example). According to datasheets,
GS45 behaves very similarly to GM45 when operating in high-performance
mode.
</p>
<p>
The theory then was that you could simply remove
the checks in coreboot and make it pass GS45 off as GM45; the idea is
that, with a high-performance mode CPU (SL9400, for example) it would
just boot up and work.
</p>
<p>
This suspicion was confirmed with the following log:
<a href="text/x200s/cblog01.txt">text/x200s/cblog01.txt</a>.
The memory modules in this case are 2x4GB. <s><b>However, not all
configurations work: <a href="text/x200s/cblog02.txt">text/x200s/cblog02.txt</a> (2x2GB)
and <a href="text/x200s/cblog03.txt">text/x200s/cblog03.txt</a> (1x2GB)
show a failed bootup.</b></s> <i>False alarm. The modules were mixed (non-matching). X200S
with high-performance mode CPU will work so long as you use matching memory modules
(doesn't matter what size).</i>
</p>
<p>
This was then pushed as a patch for coreboot, which can be found at
<a href="http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/7786/">http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/7786/</a>
(libreboot merges this patch in coreboot-libre now. Check the 'getcb' script in
src or git).
</p>
<div class="subsection">
<h3 id="x200s_raminit">Proper GS45 raminit</h3>
<p>
A new northbridge gs45 should be added to coreboot, based on gm45,
and a new port x200st (X200S and X200T) should be added based on
the x200 port.
</p>
<p>
This port would have proper raminit. Alternatively, gs45 (if
raminit is taken to be the only issue with it) can be part of
gm45 northbridge support (and X200S/Tablet being part of the X200
port) with conditional checks in the raminit that make raminit
work differently (as required) for GS45. nico_h and pgeorgi/patrickg
in the coreboot IRC channel should know more about raminit on gm45
and likely gs45.
</p>
<p>
pgeorgi recommends to run SerialICE on the factory BIOS (for X200S),
comparing it with X200 (factory BIOS) and X200 (gm45 raminit code
in coreboot), to see what the differences are. Then tweak raminit
code based on that.
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h2 id="lcd_supported_list">LCD compatibility list</h2>
<p>
Unless otherwise noted (italic styling, underlined), these are CCFL 1280x800 screens with TN panels inside.
Please do advise if you spot mistakes here.
</p>
<p>
Use the instructions at <a href="../misc/index.html#get_edid_panelname">../misc/index.html#get_edid_panelname</a>
to get the name of your panel, then check it against the list below. If your panel is untested, then by all means
try it! (and get in touch with the libreboot project to advise whether or not it worked).
</p>
<p>
AUO = AU Optronics. List of panels below based on
<a href="http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/TFT_display">http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/TFT_display</a>
</p>
<p>
Tested LCD panels (confirmed working):
</p>
<ul>
<li>X200/X200S: LG-Philips LP121WX3-TLC1 (sgsit on IRC has this panel) (LED backlight)</li>
<li>X200/X200S: Samsung LTN121AT03 (phcoder on IRC has this panel)</li>
<li>X200/X200S: AUO B121EW03 V.6 (fchmmr on IRC has this panel)</li>
<li>X200S: TMD-Toshiba LTD121EQ3B (1440x900 resolution) (LED backlight) (sgsit on IRC has this panel)</li>
</ul>
<p>
Untested LCD panels (status unknown):
</p>
<ul>
<li>X200 Tablet: TMD-Toshiba LTD121KX6B (LED backlight)</li>
<li>X200/X200S: TMD-Toshiba LTD121EWVB</li>
<li>X200/X200S: AOU B121EW09 V.2 (LED backlight)</li>
<li>X200/X200S: FRU 42T0715 (no manufacturer/model given) (LED backlight)</li>
<li>X200/X200S: LG-Philips LP121WX3-TLA1 (LED backlight)</li>
<li>X200/X200S: 42T0713 FRU (no model/manufacturer given) (LED backlight)</li>
</ul>
<p>
<a href="#pagetop">Back to top of page.</a>
</p>
<div class="subsection">
<h3 id="ips">
AFFS/IPS panels
</h3>
<h4>X200</h4>
<p>
Adapted from <a href="https://github.com/bibanon/Coreboot-ThinkPads/wiki/ThinkPad-X200">https://github.com/bibanon/Coreboot-ThinkPads/wiki/ThinkPad-X200</a>
</p>
<p>
Look at wikipedia for difference between TN and IPS panels. IPS have much better colour/contrast than
a regular TN, and will typically have good viewing angles.
</p>
<p>
These seem to be from the X200 tablet. You need to find one without the glass touchscreen protection on it
(might be able to remove it, though). It also must not have a digitizer on it (again, might be possible to
just simply remove the digitizer).
</p>
<ul>
<li>BOE-Hydis HV121WX4-120, HV121WX4-110 or HV121WX4-100 - cheap-ish, might be hard to find</li>
<li>Samsung LTN121AP02-001 - common to find, cheap</li>
</ul>
<p>
<b>If your X200 has an LED backlit panel in it, then you also need to get an inverter and harness cable
that is compatible with the CCFL panels. To see which panel type you have, see
<a href="#led_howtotell">#led_howtotell</a>. If you need the inverter/cable, here are part numbers:
44C9909 for CCFL LVDS cable with bluetooth and camera connections, and 42W8009 or 42W8010 for the
inverter.</b>
</p>
<p>
There are glossy and matte versions of these. Matte means anti-glare, which is what you want (in this authors opinion).
</p>
<p>
Refer to the HMM (hardware maintenance manual) for how to replace the screen.
</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=84941">ThinkPad Forums - Matte AFFS Panel on X200</a></li>
<li><a href="http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?p=660662#p660662">ThinkPad Forums - Parts for X200 AFFS Mod</a></li>
<li><a href="http://thinkwiki.de/X200_Displayumbau">ThinkWiki.de - X200 Displayumbau</a> (achtung: du musst lesen und/oder spreche deutsch;
oder ein freund fur hilfe)</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="subsection">
<h3>X200S</h3>
<p>
<a href="http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?p=618928#p618928">http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?p=618928#p618928</a>
explains that the X200S screens/assemblies are thinner. You need to replace the whole lid with one from a normal X200/X201.
</p>
</div>
<p>
<a href="#pagetop">Back to top of page.</a>
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h2 id="led_howtotell">How to tell if it has an LED or CCFL?</h2>
<p>
Some X200s have a CCFL backlight and some have an LED backlight, in their LCD panel. This
also means that the inverters will vary, so you must be careful if ever replacing either
the panel and/or inverter. (a CCFL inverter is high-voltage and will destroy an LED backlit panel).
</p>
<p>
CCFLs contain mercury. An X200 with a CCFL backlight will (<b></b>unless it has been changed to an LED,
with the correct inverter. Check with your supplier!</b>) the following: <i>"This product
contains Lithium Ion Battery, Lithium Battery and a lamp which contains mercury; dispose according to
local, state or federal laws"</i> (one with an LED backlit panel will say something different).
</p>
<p>
<a href="#pagetop">Back to top of page.</a>
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h2 id="regdumps">Hardware register dumps</h2>
<p>
The coreboot wiki <a href="http://www.coreboot.org/Motherboard_Porting_Guide">shows</a>
how to collect various logs useful in porting to new
boards. Following are outputs from the X200:
</p>
<ul>
<li>
X200 with Atmel AT25DF321 (4-MiB SOIC-8) flash
chip and Lenovo BIOS 3.18 (EC firmware 1.06):
<ul>
<li>lspci <a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/lspci.log">output</a></li>
<li>lsusb <a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/lsusb.log">output</a></li>
<li>superiotool <a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/superiotool.log">output</a></li>
<li>inteltool <a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/inteltool.log">output</a></li>
<li>ectool <a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/ectool.log">output</a></li>
<li>msrtool <a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/msrtool.log">output</a>,
<a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/msrtool.err">errors</a></li>
<li>dmidecode <a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/dmidecode.log">output</a></li>
<li>biosdecode <a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/biosdecode.log">output</a></li>
<li>nvramtool <a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/nvramtool.log">output</a></li>
<li><a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/dmesg.log">dmesg</a></li>
<li>flashrom probe <a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/flashrom_info.log">output</a>,
<a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/flashrom_info.err">errors</a></li>
<li>flashrom read <a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/flashrom_read.log">output</a>,
<a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/flashrom_read.err">errors</a></li>
<li><a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/pin_hwC0D0">/sys/class/sound/card0/hwC0D0/init_pin_configs</a></li>
<li><a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/codec%230">/proc/asound/card0/codec#0</a></li>
<li><a href="../future/dumps/x200-at25df321-lenovobios3.18/cpuinfo.log">/proc/cpuinfo</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h2 id="unsorted">Unsorted notes</h2>
<pre>
<sgsit> do you know if it's possible to flash thinkpads over the LPC debug connector at the front edge?
<sgsit> that would make life much easier for machines like this
<sgsit> all the Wistron manufactured machines have this thing called a "golden finger", normally at the front edge of the board
<sgsit> you can plug a board in which gives diagnostic codes but i'm wondering whether it is capable of more
<sgsit> <a href="http://www.endeer.cz/bios.tools/bios.html">http://www.endeer.cz/bios.tools/bios.html</a>
</pre>
</div>
<div class="section">
<p>
Copyright © 2014, 2015 Francis Rowe <info@gluglug.org.uk><br/>
Copyright © 2015 Patrick "P. J." McDermott <pj@pehjota.net><br/>
This document is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License and all future versions.
A copy of the license can be found at <a href="../license.txt">../license.txt</a>.
</p>
<p>
This document is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See <a href="../license.txt">../license.txt</a> for more information.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
|
