From 2e10d49353b8146520096fe58108cb34072be02e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michał Masłowski <mtjm@mtjm.eu>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 17:23:47 -0500
Subject: Update 6bpc vs 8bpc notes re incompatible i945 panels.

---
diff --git a/docs/future/index.html b/docs/future/index.html
index 2ebc10c..e8b03ec 100644
--- a/docs/future/index.html
+++ b/docs/future/index.html
@@ -178,11 +178,15 @@
 
 			<p>
 				About fixing remaining LCD panels on 5345:<br/>
-				'polarity' is mentioned in coreboot log (cbmem -c). compare output (with working and non-working panel). (and see the other notes in docs/future/index.html)<br/>
-				phcoder says: hint for T60: it might be that failing panels are 8bpc<br/>
-				fchmmr: what does 8bpc mean? And what do you think the other (non-failing) panel are?<br/>
-				phcoder: 6bpc. bits per colour. May also be reffered as 18-bit vs 24-bit panels<br/>
-				phcoder: just collect EDIDs from failing and working panels<br/>
+				'polarity' is mentioned in coreboot log (cbmem -c). compare output (with working and non-working panel). (and see the other notes in docs/future/index.html)</p>
+                        <p>There was a theory that working panels are
+			  6bpc (bits per colour) and nonworking are
+			  8bpc, but all EDIDs that we have here are
+			  for 6bpc panels.</p>
+                        <p>We should compare coreboot logs
+                          (from <code>cbmem -c</code> from systems with
+                          working and nonworking panels.</p>
+                        <p>How to dump EDID:</p>
 				# <b>apt-get install i2c-tools</b><br/>
 				# <b>modprobe i2c-dev</b><br/>
 				Find out the correct ID to use:<br/>
--
cgit v0.9.1