<?php /* Frequently asked questions Copyright (C) 2016 Francis Rowe <info@gluglug.org.uk> This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU Affero General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ header('Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8'); ob_start(); include_once "../common/variables.php"; include_once "../common/functions.php"; ?> <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../common/css/main.css" /> <title>Please do not use GitLab!</title> </head> <body> <div id="pagetop"> <h1>Please do not use GitLab!</h1> <p> Please do not use GitLab to host libreboot. Libreboot is a free software project, so this is only a request, and not a restriction on the software. </p> <p> <a href="../git/">Back to the Git page</a> </p> </div> <div> <h2>What's wrong with GitLab?</h2> <ul class="c"> <li> GitLab itself is proprietary software. There is a <em>community edition</em> but this is only used as a source of cheap labour for GitLab to prop up its proprietary version, which it sells for profit. In fact, the <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20141215225437/https://about.gitlab.com/2014/02/11/gitlab-ee-license-change/">Enterprise Edition used to be Free software, until early 2014</a>. What else will they make proprietary? Perhaps one day they will drop the community edition? </li> <li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150405153359/https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commits/master/doc/legal/individual_contributor_license_agreement.md">GitLab uses a CLA for all contributions to the community edition</a>. What this means is that they want you to use their permissive (non-copyleft) license, so that they can make your work proprietary as part of the enterprise edition.</li> <li><a href="https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">GitLab serves non-free JavaScript code</a></li> <li>The GitLab CEO (Sytse Sijbrandij) really likes to talk about freedom, but in reality that person's opinion is the same as the <a href="../github/">GitHub</a> CEO</li> <li> Monopolistic practises. For instance, GitLab <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150905091808/https://about.gitlab.com/2015/03/03/gitlab-acquires-gitorious/">bought out Gitorious</a> just to asset strip it. Gitorious was the go-to Git hosting provider for Free Software developers, and Gitorious was released under AGPLv3 which meant that it truly safeguarded user freedom. GitLab killed it. </li> </ul> <p> GitLab simply uses Free Software for its own benefit, releasing source code under a free license only when suited to it's business goals; they are quite happy to violate the rights of their users, for profit. </p> <p> By contrast, the libreboot project adheres strictly to the goals of the Free Software movement, which seeks to eliminate proprietary software to the point where all software is free. </p> <p> The opinions expressed by the CEO of GitLab (not to mention, the actions of GitLab BV) are incompatible with those of the libreboot project. Users and developers of <em><a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a></em> are strongly advised not to use GitLab, for any of their projects. </p> </div> <div> <h2>Where should I host and share my code?</h2> <p> <a href="../git/#githosting">Read this section on the libreboot website</a> for a list of recommended Git hosting providers. </p> </div> <?php include "../common/footer.php"; ?> </body> </html> <?php $strHtml = ob_get_clean(); echo miniHtml($strHtml); ?>