From 3fc4d7f23f6e499aed2b5d76591cef43145053a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Francis Rowe Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:50:25 -0500 Subject: Please do not use GitLab --- (limited to 'site/gitlab') diff --git a/site/gitlab/index.php b/site/gitlab/index.php new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b7d2943 --- /dev/null +++ b/site/gitlab/index.php @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify + it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as + published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the + License, or (at your option) any later version. + + This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + GNU Affero General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License + along with this program. If not, see . +*/ + header('Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8'); + ob_start(); + include_once "../common/variables.php"; + include_once "../common/functions.php"; +?> + + + + + Please do not use GitLab! + + + + +
+ +

Please do not use GitLab!

+ +

+ Please do not use GitLab to host libreboot. + Libreboot is a free software project, so this is only a request, and not a restriction on the software. +

+ +

+ Back to the Git page +

+ +
+ +
+

What's wrong with GitLab?

+
    +
  • + GitLab itself is proprietary software. There is a community edition but this is only used as + a source of cheap labour for GitLab to prop up its proprietary version, which it sells for profit. + In fact, the Enterprice Edition used to be Free software, until early 2014. What else will they make proprietary? Perhaps one day they will drop the community edition? +
    • +
  • GitLab uses a CLA for all contributions to the community edition. What this means is that they want you to use their permissive (non-copyleft) license, so that they can make your work proprietary as part of the enterprise edition.
    • +
  • GitLab serves non-free JavaScript code
    • +
  • The GitLab CEO really likes to talk about freedom, but in reality that person's opinion is the same as the GitHub CEO
    • +
  • + Monopolistic practises. For instance, GitLab bought out Gitorious just to asset strip it. Gitorious was the go-to Git hosting provider for Free Software developers, and Gitorious was released under AGPLv3 which meant + that it truly safeguarded user freedom. GitLab killed it. +
    • +
+ +

+ GitLab simply uses Free Software for its own benefit, releasing source code under a free license + only when suited to it's business goals; they are quite happy to violate the rights of their users, for profit. +

+ +

+ By contrast, the libreboot project adheres strictly to the goals of the Free Software movement, which + seeks to eliminate proprietary software to the point where all software is free. +

+ +

+ The opinions expressed by the CEO of GitLab (not to mention, the actions of GitLab BV) are incompatible with those of + the libreboot project. Users and developers of free software are strongly advised not to use GitLab, for any of their projects. +

+ +
+ +
+

Where should I host and share my code?

+

+ Read this section on the libreboot website for a list of recommended Git hosting providers. +

+ +
+ + + + + + -- cgit v0.9.1