From 583009475eecec8b13c6d1feb5a1b0be7c75cf00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francis Rowe <info@gluglug.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:52:38 -0500
Subject: name and shame the GitLab CEO

---
(limited to 'site/gitlab/index.php')

diff --git a/site/gitlab/index.php b/site/gitlab/index.php
index b7d2943..1bd89b2 100644
--- a/site/gitlab/index.php
+++ b/site/gitlab/index.php
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
 					</li>
 					<li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150405153359/https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commits/master/doc/legal/individual_contributor_license_agreement.md">GitLab uses a CLA for all contributions to the community edition</a>. What this means is that they want you to use their permissive (non-copyleft) license, so that they can make your work proprietary as part of the enterprise edition.</li>
 					<li><a href="https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">GitLab serves non-free JavaScript code</a></li>
-					<li>The GitLab CEO really likes to talk about freedom, but in reality that person's opinion is the same as the <a href="../github/">GitHub</a> CEO</li>
+					<li>The GitLab CEO (Sytse Sijbrandij) really likes to talk about freedom, but in reality that person's opinion is the same as the <a href="../github/">GitHub</a> CEO</li>
 					<li>
 						Monopolistic practises. For instance, GitLab <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150905091808/https://about.gitlab.com/2015/03/03/gitlab-acquires-gitorious/">bought out Gitorious</a> just to asset strip it. Gitorious was the go-to Git hosting provider for Free Software developers, and Gitorious was released under AGPLv3 which meant
 						that it truly safeguarded user freedom. GitLab killed it.
--
cgit v0.9.1