From 987bac5cf0d73a8a99ff9083135482e1c17fe2d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Francis Rowe Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:49:35 -0400 Subject: typo fix --- (limited to 'site/faq') diff --git a/site/faq/index.php b/site/faq/index.php index d5eac9c..158e22c 100644 --- a/site/faq/index.php +++ b/site/faq/index.php @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ <CareBear\>if a DMA Setup FIS is sent first, with the Auto-Activate bit set, then it is already set up, and the drive can initiate DMA
<CareBear\> "First party DMA is a superset capability not neccessarily supported by legacy mode devices or legacy mode device drivers but essential for accommodating future capabilities." translation: if the problem isn't already there it will be shortly
<CareBear\> "Upon receiving a DMA Setup, the receiver of the FIS shall validate the received DMA Setup request" - ie. the host is supposed to validate, but hey, maybe there's a bug there..
- <CareBear\> "The specific implementation of the buffer identifier and buffer/address validation is not specified." - so noone will actually bother + <CareBear\> "The specific implementation of the buffer identifier and buffer/address validation is not specified." - so noone will actually bother
<Basstard`> "the receiver of the FIS"
<CareBear\> in the case we're considering that's the host controller hardware in the chipset and/or the kernel driver
<CareBear\> most likely kernel driver
-- cgit v0.9.1