From c5b865de743f3b20efb62812b51bfd535fbcff67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francis Rowe <info@gluglug.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:58:15 -0400
Subject: FAQ (FSP): emphasize the scope of the problem

---
diff --git a/site/faq/index.php b/site/faq/index.php
index ea08eb3..b8cf02d 100644
--- a/site/faq/index.php
+++ b/site/faq/index.php
@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@
 						On all recent Intel systems, coreboot support has revolved around integrating a blob (for each system) called
 						the <i>FSP</i> (firmware support package), which handles most of the hardware initialization, including
 						memory initialization. At present, it is believed that this can be replaced, but it will require a lot
-						of work on reverse engineering which will likely take many years. Intel distributes the FSP blob to
-						firmware developers (including coreboot).
+						of work on reverse engineering which will likely take many years, even for the most skilled developer working full-time.
+						Intel distributes the FSP blob to firmware developers (including coreboot).
 					</p>
 				<h3>Intel is uncooperative</h3>
 					<p>
--
cgit v0.9.1