summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/site/git
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* git page: further emphasize that no-name contributions are OKFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-6/+5
|
* git page: remove trailing dotFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: clarify that no-name is OKFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-2/+3
|
* git page: say some, not mostFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
| | | | | How do we know that "most" people do this, or want to? We should never assume this.
* git page: add missing line breakFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: add note about verifying commit before sendingFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-0/+6
|
* git page: mention guidelines before downloadsFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-24/+24
|
* git page: fix typoFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: clarify that the user needs to have git installedFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-0/+4
|
* git page: mention that no-copyright is not public domainFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+4
| | | | Also, mention that no-license means non-free.
* git page: mention that git can use other coloursFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+2
|
* git page: warn redgreen colour blind people about git diff coloursFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-0/+3
|
* git page: fix minor language detailFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: clarify that using your name is also OKFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: further emphasize that a name is not requiredFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+5
|
* git page: clarify that no-name is also an optionFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+2
|
* git page: mention that libreboot has an IRC channelFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: add instructions for anonymous committersFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-2/+3
|
* git page: improve navigationFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-21/+46
|
* git page: add anchor to headerFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: mention "pen names" in relation to copyrightFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-0/+1
|
* git page: clarify that it's about name changesFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: really emphasize the pointFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: fix formattingFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-2/+1
|
* git page: emphasize the important bitsFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-2/+2
|
* git page: say assume name, not aliasFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-2/+2
| | | | | "alias" implies that the name is somehow "fake". assumed name seems better
* git page: facilitated, not aidedFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: clarify that git facilitates developmentFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: make note about --author boldFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: note about the --author option in git-commitFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-0/+6
|
* git page: fix formatting issueFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-2/+2
|
* git page: say how amazing git isFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+5
|
* git page: note about mailing listsFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+2
|
* add note about maintainers on the git pageFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+5
|
* clean up the git pageFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-80/+80
|
* git page: remove unnecessary colonFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: remove repetitionFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: add link to copyleft.orgFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: change priority of guidelinesFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-4/+4
|
* git page: remove note about license headersFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-16/+17
| | | | | This isn't actually required. A copyright notice is not required. Replace with a header "General guidelines"
* git page: working, not planningFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-1/+1
|
* git page: note about texinfo for documentationFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-0/+4
|
* git page: add extra guideline for documentation patchesFrancis Rowe2015-10-291-0/+4
|
* git page: add extra linkFrancis Rowe2015-10-281-1/+1
|
* legal name, not real name. also, apologies for typo in last commitFrancis Rowe2015-10-281-1/+1
|
* git page: make it less biased towards gisgendered menFrancis Rowe2015-10-281-3/+4
|
* git page: add link to home pageFrancis Rowe2015-08-091-0/+2
|
* git page: make git repos a headerFrancis Rowe2015-08-091-4/+4
|
* git page: Make gitweb links a separate linkFrancis Rowe2015-08-091-2/+4
|
* git page: remove note about refusing GFDLFrancis Rowe2015-07-041-8/+2
| | | | | | I still don't like it. However, having this notice here scares people, even if they had no plans to use GFDL. The notice is useless.