From 1fe77a920b952fe1cf997c72a0407384e767a039 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Francis Rowe Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:42:08 -0500 Subject: docs/security/t60_security.html Shorten description docs/security/x60_security.html Shorten description --- (limited to 'docs') diff --git a/docs/security/t60_security.html b/docs/security/t60_security.html index eb3db03..5fc96c1 100644 --- a/docs/security/t60_security.html +++ b/docs/security/t60_security.html @@ -45,28 +45,12 @@

Most people think of security on the software side: the hardware is important aswell. - Hardware security is useful in particular to journalists (or activists in a given movement) who need absolute privacy in their work. - It is also generally useful to all those that believe security and privacy are inalienable rights. - Security starts with the hardware; crypto and network security come later. -

-

- Paradoxically, going this far to increase your security also makes you a bigger target. - At the same time, it protects you in the case that someone does attack your machine. - This paradox only exists while few people take adequate steps to protect yourself: it is your duty - to protect yourself, not only for your benefit but to make strong security normal so - that those who do need protection (and claim it) are a smaller target against the masses. -

-

- Even if there are levels of security beyond your ability (technically, financially and so on) - doing at least something (what you are able to do) is extremely important. - If you use the internet and your computer without protection, attacking you is cheap (some say it is - only a few US cents). If everyone (majority of people) use strong security by default, - it makes attacks more costly and time consuming; in effect, making them disappear. + work.

This tutorial deals with reducing the number of devices that have direct memory access that could communicate with inputs/outputs that could be used to remotely - command the machine (or leak data). + command the machine (or leak data). All of this is purely theoretical for the time being.

Disassembly

diff --git a/docs/security/x60_security.html b/docs/security/x60_security.html index 33ccb6d..515c8fc 100644 --- a/docs/security/x60_security.html +++ b/docs/security/x60_security.html @@ -45,28 +45,12 @@

Most people think of security on the software side: the hardware is important aswell. - Hardware security is useful in particular to journalists (or activists in a given movement) who need absolute privacy in their work. - It is also generally useful to all those that believe security and privacy are inalienable rights. - Security starts with the hardware; crypto and network security come later. -

-

- Paradoxically, going this far to increase your security also makes you a bigger target. - At the same time, it protects you in the case that someone does attack your machine. - This paradox only exists while few people take adequate steps to protect yourself: it is your duty - to protect yourself, not only for your benefit but to make strong security normal so - that those who do need protection (and claim it) are a smaller target against the masses. -

-

- Even if there are levels of security beyond your ability (technically, financially and so on) - doing at least something (what you are able to do) is extremely important. - If you use the internet and your computer without protection, attacking you is cheap (some say it is - only a few US cents). If everyone (majority of people) use strong security by default, - it makes attacks more costly and time consuming; in effect, making them disappear. + work.

This tutorial deals with reducing the number of devices that have direct memory access that could communicate with inputs/outputs that could be used to remotely - command the machine (or leak data). + command the machine (or leak data). All of this is purely theoretical for the time being.

Disassembly

-- cgit v0.9.1