From a4e149725119aa5ed34a1f48ea004bbfb34c231c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francis Rowe <info@gluglug.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:51:34 -0400
Subject: docs/hcl/c201.html: Clarify that only non-malicious microcode's ok

---
(limited to 'docs/hcl/c201.html')

diff --git a/docs/hcl/c201.html b/docs/hcl/c201.html
index 1955cb6..68937fd 100644
--- a/docs/hcl/c201.html
+++ b/docs/hcl/c201.html
@@ -253,7 +253,8 @@
 			<p>
 				Unlike x86 (e.g. Intel/AMD) CPUs, ARM CPUs do not use microcode, not even built in.
 				On the Intel/AMD based libreboot systems, there is still microcode in the CPU
-				(not considered problematic by the FSF, since it's part of the hardware and read-only), but we
+				(not considered problematic by the FSF provided that it is reasonably trusted
+				to not be malicious, since it's part of the hardware and read-only), but we
 				exclude microcode updates (volatile updates which are uploaded at boot time by the boot firmware,
 				if present), which are proprietary software.
 			</p>
--
cgit v0.9.1