From aca8d9935b280fb51a2bc2332be63c56301c5dbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: P. J. McDermott <pj@pehjota.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 19:11:47 -0500
Subject: TODO: Describe ctxsw optimization

---
(limited to 'TODO')

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index e60e7e5..a6e79b5 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -7,3 +7,12 @@
       Example: array `arr_` and index `ind`: stored as `__arr_arr___x__ind`
       Example: array `arr` and index `_ind`: stored as `__arr_arr__x___ind`
       Example: array `arr_` and index `_ind`: stored as `__arr_arr___x___ind`
+  * Consider ctxsw optimization:
+    - In backend, prefix parameter names (in assignments and expansions) with TU
+      and function
+    - In eshrt, remove variable updating code
+    - Caveat: breaks variable parameter names in eval
+    - If arrays are implemented, would anyone still need variable parameter
+      names?
+    - Maybe add -fno-mangle-vars option to eshtrans to disable prefixing and
+      insert a flag in generated code to enable eshrt to update variables
--
cgit v0.9.1